Why the Evidence Gap Exists
Modern data protection laws require accountability, but most organizations rely on fragmented tools, self-reported controls, and point-in-time assessments.
These approaches generate activity, not evidence. They were never designed to produce independent, defensible audit records that hold up over time.
Fragmented Oversight
Security, privacy, IT, and compliance data live in separate systems, owned by different teams. No single source produces a complete, independent record of accountability.
Point-in-Time Assessments
Audits and reviews capture a moment, not ongoing behavior. They cannot show sustained accountability between audits, incidents, or regulatory inquiries.
Self-Attested Controls
Most compliance evidence is based on internal attestations, screenshots, or questionnaires, not independent verification of how systems actually operate.
No Evidence Standard
Laws define accountability expectations, but rarely define how evidence must be created, preserved, or validated over time.
How EDDi Creates Defensible Evidence
EDDi generates independent, verifiable audit records continuously, not just at review time.
EDDi operates as an independent evidence layer across IT, security, and compliance environments.
Rather than relying on self-reported controls or periodic assessments, EDDi continuously captures, timestamps, and preserves audit-relevant signals as systems operate.
The result is a defensible record of accountability that can be examined over time, across incidents, audits, and regulatory inquiries.
Built on Proven Governance Experience
EDDi is designed by practitioners with decades of experience in IT audit, security governance, and regulatory accountability.
25+
Years of Experience
Global
Multi-jurisdiction regulatory experience
Framework
Aligned
CIS, NIST, ISO, and regional data protection laws
Independent
Audit methodology built for defensible evidence
Continuous
Always-on evidence preservation over time
Regulatory Environments Navigated
Experience reflects audit, advisory, and governance engagement across these jurisdictions.
Start a Defensible Conversation
Organizations engage EDDi when accountability, evidence, and regulatory defensibility matter.
EDDi engagements typically begin with a confidential discussion about governance, accountability expectations, and evidentiary requirements.
Whether you are preparing for regulatory scrutiny, strengthening executive oversight, or evaluating independent audit evidence, this conversation is designed to clarify what defensible accountability looks like in your environment.
